|
 |
| Recent blog posts: | |
|
| Forums: | | |
|
| Discuss: | |
|
| Recent forum topics: | |
|
| Recent forum comments: | |
|
| Модератор: | |
|
Wednesday, 2 August 2006
|
| OT: sugar and pepper [was:Re: comparing seo techniques [was: To hyphen or not to hyphen]] Els 19:14:48 |
| | Big Bill wrote:>>[energy drink]>>>>Meaning that if I'm slightly tired in the afternoon, and drink>>>>one can, about an hour later I'm feeling very tired. Just like any>>>>drug, I suppose. >>>
Sounds like a sugar crash.>> Nah, I don't have the same after sugary Tea or any other sugar filled>>soda. > Sugar we put in beverages is only one of the sugar family. My chem> goes awry here but I think refined carbs get turned into glucose and> so you get a sugar rush and crash from processed white bread. It's the> same thing, more or less.
Yes, but would the sugar in these energy drinks not be the same as in
other beverages? Meaning - the tiredness I feel after the effect has
worn off, would be the same after drinking coke or sprite. But it
isn't. I reckon it must be the effect of either the overdose of
cafeine, or else one of the other ingredients, like taurine. Not sure
what that one does exactly.
I eat a load of hot peppers, though, which cools me down. If I'm>>> going to the gym I try to fit in some haggis with hot peppers in it>>> before I go. >> You mean hot peppers make you sweat, so you can release the heat?> They don't make you sweat, they dilate your blood vessels so your> capillaries expand bringing your blood nearer to the skin's surface,> where it cools. So I'm like a big radiator walking about.
I believe that entirely, but why does eating pepper make me feel hot
instead of cool then?
--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
accessible web design: http://locusoptimus.com/
|
| |  30 answers | Add comment |
|
| Hi, New To This Sandy 16:25:20 |
| | Hi,
All, I would first like to thank all of those that have helped me with
regards to some issues that I had with my website.
Please can any one tell about sitemaps.xml, i have created a
sitemap.xml and uploaded it next to my index.html file.
Next, what i should do to make google crawl my website.
Where i should register my sitemap.xml in google sitemaps
what steps i should take, please some one suggest.
www.alldebtonline.com
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Sandy.
www.alldebtonline.com
|
| | 4 answer | Add comment |
|
| Free One Way Links Fortuneinfo 09:17:49 |
| | Hi,
I just opened my new directory.
http://www.what-is-internet-marketing.com/links
Please feel free to add your website to my directory. No reciprocal
link required.
Thanks
http://www.what-is-internet-marketing.com
|
| | Add comment |
|
| Goog Jamming Yahoo Again Edinny 06:18:04 |
| | Are those guys slick or what?
Yahoo can't load no problem with goog though.
|
| | 2 answer | Add comment |
|
| AISE Stats: 25/07/2006-01/08/2006 Roy Schestowitz 05:09:06 |
| | В¤ Times are Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) +0:00
В¤ Statistics span a period of approximately 7 days
and are automatically generated every Tuesday
В¤ Subject line formatted consistently "AISE Stats: <DATES>"
В¤ Killfile <subject contains "AISE Stats: "> if uninterested
____________________________________________________________
Turquoise SuperStat 2.2 * Message area statistics
=================================================
(c) Copyright 1998-2005 Peter Karlsson
This report covers 663 messages written between 2006-07-25 00:18:41 and
2006-08-01 23:18:41
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quoters (includes people who have written at least three messages)
Place Name Msgs Ratio
1. dcashley <dcashley@adelphia.net> 5 79.96%
2. smart <smart_outsourcing@yahoo.com> 3 73.73%
3. twice.redeemed@gmail.com 7 73.26%
4. T.J. <no1@home.invalid> 16 72.52%
5. tonnie <t.prasing@chello.nl> 29 72.52%
6. Jez <j.ez@virgin.net> 8 71.87%
7. Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> 116 64.98%
8. markbiernat@yahoo.com 4 61.43%
9. Noticedtrends <noticedtrends@hotmail.com> 3 59.73%
10. YourTrafficBoost.com <george_asprey@hotmail.com> 10 59.65%
11. Els <els.aNOSPAM@tiscali.nl> 87 57.27%
12. canadafred <canadian_web@hotmail.com> 92 57.24%
13. Timm's <steventimmermans@yahoo.co.uk> 3 56.02%
14. mark r <markrush@gmail.com> 3 55.36%
15. Logician <sales@logicians.com> 6 54.49%
A total of 946712 bytes were written (message bodies only), of which 513584,
or 54.25%, were quotes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toplist of writers
Place Name Msgs Bytes Quoted
1. Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> 116 134609 65.0%
2. canadafred <canadian_web@hotmail.com> 92 169306 57.2%
3. Els <els.aNOSPAM@tiscali.nl> 87 161800 57.3%
4. John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> 81 113626 43.6%
5. Stacey <Remove-the-Y-stacey@staceyssimplestuff.com 52 74778 51.3%
6. tonnie <t.prasing@chello.nl> 29 66463 72.5%
7. T.J. <no1@home.invalid> 16 40162 72.5%
8. YourTrafficBoost.com <george_asprey@hotmail.com> 10 8307 59.6%
9. Tomi Häsä <tomi.hasa@gmail.com> 9 6915 35.8%
10. David <seodave@search-engine-optimization-services 8 18575 37.1%
Jez <j.ez@virgin.net> 8 3910 71.9%
12. twice.redeemed@gmail.com 7 7415 73.3%
13. Andrew Heenan <andrew.heenan@virgin.net> 6 6920 35.1%
Logician <sales@logicians.com> 6 5594 54.5%
webseoguy <webseoguy@gmail.com> 6 3295 24.2%
A total of 86 people were identified.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toplist of original content per message (of people who have written at least
three messages)
Place Name Orig. / Msgs = PrMsg Quoted
1. Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com 11356 / 5 = 2271 14.4%
2. David <seodave@search-engine-optimization-s 11678 / 8 = 1459 37.1%
3. Timm's <steventimmermans@yahoo.co.uk> 2611 / 3 = 870 56.0%
4. Els <els.aNOSPAM@tiscali.nl> 69144 / 87 = 794 57.3%
5. John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> 64139 / 81 = 791 43.6%
6. canadafred <canadian_web@hotmail.com> 72391 / 92 = 786 57.2%
7. Andrew Heenan <andrew.heenan@virgin.net> 4494 / 6 = 749 35.1%
8. roxxy <nfosrc@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid 2134 / 3 = 711
9. Stacey <Remove-the-Y-stacey@staceyssimplest 36412 / 52 = 700 51.3%
10. T.J. <no1@home.invalid> 11036 / 16 = 689 72.5%
11. www.1-script.com <info_at_1-script_dot_com@ 3314 / 5 = 662 25.8%
12. tonnie <t.prasing@chello.nl> 18267 / 29 = 629 72.5%
13. Tom James <tombenjames@yahoo.com> 1752 / 3 = 584 42.0%
14. carlrs <carl@americanaquariumproducts.com> 1621 / 3 = 540 40.3%
15. Noticedtrends <noticedtrends@hotmail.com> 1587 / 3 = 529 59.7%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toplist of subjects
Place Subject Msgs Bytes
1. To hyphen or not to hyphen (Was:Re: Google's Little Devil 115 214333
2. comparing seo techniques [was: To hyphen or not to hyphen 114 245445
3. Odd PR dispersion 55 94728
4. the Google to be - the future is dark 31 36119
5. OT: sugar and pepper [was:Re: comparing seo techniques [w 27 42692
What does SEO cost? 27 20127
7. Google Submission 21 16068
8. Reference on Fred Joly 16 16602
9. No Longer in SERP? 15 11672
10. How to use Google adwords?? 14 17888
11. Spaces in file names? 13 29504
Database content and search engines 13 13239
13. No ODP Tag 11 6322
14. white hat, blah blah blah 10 16654
15. Specifying Keywords in Blog 8 5133
A total of 76 subjects were identified.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toplist of programs
Place Program Msgs
1. G2 195
0.2:195
2. Forte Agent 126
1.7/32.534:116 1.8/32.548:1 2.0/32.652:8 3.3/32.846:1
3. Microsoft Outlook Express 93
6.00.2800.1106:2 6.00.2800.1409:1 6.00.2900.2180:1 6.00.2900.2869:89
4. 40tude_Dialog 87
2.0.15.1:87
5. Xnews 81
2005.10.18:81
6. Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 22
7. Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 13
8. Mozilla 8
5.0:8
9. KNode 7
0.7.2:5 0.8.2:2
10. http: 5
/www.1-script.com/forums/:5
Opera Mail/9.00 5
12. Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 3
newsSync 3
PCBOARD.IN):3
14. MT-NewsWatcher 2
3.5.1:2
News Rover 8.2.2 2
A total of 18 different programs (not counting different versions) were
identified.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings per weekday
Day Msgs
Monday 107 ************************************
Tuesday 178 ************************************************************
Wednesday 53 *****************
Thursday 50 ****************
Friday 131 ********************************************
Saturday 80 **************************
Sunday 64 *********************
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings per hour
Hour Msgs
0000-0059 23 ***************************
0100-0159 17 ********************
0200-0259 18 *********************
0300-0359 24 ****************************
0400-0459 16 *******************
0500-0559 14 ****************
0600-0659 13 ***************
0700-0759 23 ***************************
0800-0859 19 **********************
0900-0959 19 **********************
1000-1059 33 ***************************************
1100-1159 28 *********************************
1200-1259 38 *********************************************
1300-1359 34 ****************************************
1400-1459 29 **********************************
1500-1559 24 ****************************
1600-1659 39 **********************************************
1700-1759 21 *************************
1800-1859 46 *******************************************************
1900-1959 29 **********************************
2000-2059 48 *********************************************************
2100-2159 50 ************************************************************
2200-2259 22 **************************
2300-2359 36 *******************************************
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | Add comment |
Tuesday, 1 August 2006
|
| Omit Meta Tag Keywords? Guest 18:23:59 |
| | Someone told me that meta tag keywords have fallen from
favour and that it is better now to omit them.
He said that there has been so much abuse of keywords
that searchengines are now starting to ignore them, and
even to award negative ranking for their misuse.
He also said that omitting them forces the spiders to index
the whole page.
Any truth to his claims?
I am certainly no expert - I am just trying to figure things
out as I go along, so advice is appreciated. Thanks!
|
| | 5 answers | Add comment |
|
| Cypher - Natural Language to RDF/SeRQL for the Semantic Web Smonroe 18:03:00 |
| | Hi All,
I've recently released a program I'd like to share with those
interested in building semantics and natural language processing into
search engines implementations.
Cypher is one of the first software program available which generates
the metadata representation of natural language input. Cypher produces
RDF graph and SeRQL query representations of sentences, clauses,
phrases and questions. The Cypher framework provides a set of robust
definition languages, which can be used to extend and create grammars
and lexicons. Cypher programming is fun to learn and easy to use, and
the specifications are designed to allow a novice to quickly and easily
build transcoders for processing highly complex sentences and phrases
of any natural language, and to cover any vocabulary.
The free software and related documentation can be found at:
http://cypher.monrai.com
Enjoy,
sherman
|
| | 1 answer | Add comment |
|
| MSN got new botties! Big Bill 14:13:47 |
| | These are they apparently;
"The MSN Shopping bot is msnbot-products, the MSN News bot is
msnbot-news, the MSN Image Search bot is msnbot-MM, the MSN Search bot
is still just plain msnbot."
BB
--
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-services.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/baby-gund/index.html
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/jules-cheret-posters.htm
|
| | Add comment |
|
| Odd PR dispersion Gerhard Buergmann 14:03:53 |
| | At one of my sites - http://www.pointinger.com/ - the PR distribution is
completely different to normal sites:
The home page has PR 2, the next page in the main menu has PR 0 and
all other pages of the main menu and of the sub menus have PR 4.
Nearly all incoming links are pointing to the domain name.
All pages are apporx. 5 month old, the domain exists for many years.
How is this possible?
Thanks,
Gerhard
--
Gerhard BГјrgmann
http://www.pointinger.com/
http://www.mayerofen.com/
|
| | 54 answer | Add comment |
|
| Natural Ranking Questions Guest 07:00:18 |
| | I'm really new to this e-commerce thing. I don't understand anything
about how to find good placement in the natural rankings. I have been
told that my website www.thelittlereddoor.net is written badly and that
my flash is useless and a problem. We are using GoogleAdwords just to
be found at all, but I need to know specifically what it is that is
wrong so that I can deal with it myself or specifically tell my web
designer what is wrong. I am also now reading that I should have links
leading to my site? What is that? How do I do it? Please help, I am
pretty desperate at this point. Thanks
|
| | 6 answers | Add comment |
|
| No Longer in SERP? Attacktwinkie 04:23:30 |
| | I've been helping a company try to move up the Orgainc Results for one
of their sites. The site is http://www.militaryschool.us on July14
ago they were in position #139 then on July 21 they were in 132 (I've
been making slow changes to avoid being sandboxed) However today they
don't show up at all.
I'm not sure what has happended. I also not sure what my next move
is. Any help would be accepted gratefully.
-- I know the flash navigation is awefull. That is the next thing to
change --
|
| | 14 answers | Add comment |
Monday, 31 July 2006
|
| Question about SE terminology Kevin Duggan 17:30:38 |
| |
I am trying to find a graphic/picture
which shows how there is a web
between the search engines,
how some share information.
I have seen this before but can not find it now.
I am probobly using the wrong search terms.
I looked on Search engine Watch and could not find
any info.
What I remember seeing before was
a graphic with boxes representing the engines and arrows
showing how they were connected.
thanks
Kevin
--
http://www.duggan.tv
http://www.kevsblues.com
|
| | 3 answer | Add comment |
|
| pre-registering .co.uk domains pending deletion! Mark R 16:39:40 |
| | Hi there,
theres a domain i want badly, its not be re-registered and is now going
through the 60 day wait until it becomes available.
is there a service that will allow me to pre-register the domain so
that the nano-second it becomes available i can get it (before a
sqatter gets there first)?
thanks
Mark
|
| | 4 answer | Add comment |
Sunday, 30 July 2006
|
| Google not filtering duplicates - still Logician 12:52:54 |
| | Today I was looking for NDE (near death experiences) information, and
as I searched Google I saw the SAME articles, I mean exactly the same,
time and time again in the Google Top 10.
eg
http://science.krishna.org/Articles/2000/10/00189.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/986177.stm
This are just examples, but I saw the excessive duplication a lot all
in Google's Top 10.
Clearly, Google is still not looking at content, but links to content -
what a joke. Sometimes you have to scroll through 3 pages just to find
something original.
Regarding news articles, probably a massive amount is just duplication
- I mean exactly the same article just reprinted under different names.
This is because news outlets uses AP.
|
| | 2 answer | Add comment |
|
|
